It's running a bog stock red 202
I've had a look online for info but nothing on fuel consumption for a 202.
I was thinking I'd get the original mpg and multiply by .8 to allow fo wear n' tear.
any ideas would be appreciated.......
Yeah, good move. It's a shame the interstate car freighters won't let you transport any parts or other stuff inside the car. Got hammered with that one myself bringing Plastic the FB across and had to stash some goodies under the front seat where they couldn't see themMyEKisdriven wrote:The back of the ute is full of parts (, bits n' pieces) which is why I was thinking to drive it home
I had that problem getting my FB over from AdelaideMeFB wrote:Yeah, good move. It's a shame the interstate car freighters won't let you transport any parts or other stuff inside the car. Got hammered with that one myself bringing Plastic the FB across and had to stash some goodies under the front seat where they couldn't see themMyEKisdriven wrote:The back of the ute is full of parts (, bits n' pieces) which is why I was thinking to drive it home![]()
![]()
harry186 wrote:what about traini know a mat that moved over then back again
found it cheapest by train and also the car was loaded not with car parts though just general house moving stuff there was some car stuff in there though
as to fuel i'de work on about 13-15 litres per 100k i've had many red powered EK's and the only one that came close to DR's figures (not saying his didn't) was one with a 5 speed manual and 202's are notorious for being heavy on fuel plus it's better to over budget than under
Around 100 to 110. Depending on the legal limit of courseharry186 wrote:what were yor speeds
That's just marking its territory!MyEKisdriven wrote: I'm more concerned about the oil under the thing
(, my boy was describing oil under the car when he picked the ute up from the previous owner last Saturday)