Strange FX in shed
-
fxfjholden.com
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 7:18 pm
- State: NOT ENTERED
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Tim,
As you probably know you only have to get under it to see if it is really a very very early.
Gut feeling is your on the money re a rebirth and a pretty bad rebirth of the ID tag.
JAson
As you probably know you only have to get under it to see if it is really a very very early.
Gut feeling is your on the money re a rebirth and a pretty bad rebirth of the ID tag.
JAson
"From FJ to HZ, if you don't drive a HOLDEN you're better off DEAD"
fxfjholden forums - http://forums.fxfjholden.com
fxfjholden forums - http://forums.fxfjholden.com
- BILLY BLACKARROW
- Posts: 1065
- Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 9:22 pm
- State: NSW
- Location: NEWCASTLE MACQUARIE HILLS
POST
Did anyone notice the over riders are different on each car does it mean one is a fj other fx not up on these models
BILLY
BILLY
-
Mick Jagger
- Posts: 3434
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:48 pm
- State: NOT ENTERED
- Location: Brisbane
-
Mick Jagger
- Posts: 3434
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:48 pm
- State: NOT ENTERED
- Location: Brisbane
-
Smooth customs
- Posts: 771
- Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 3:51 pm
- State: NOT ENTERED
The black car has the correct over riders
The Blue sedan has FJ's
But the Blue sedan has the night light switch on the underside of the right tail light fin, that makes it an early production model
Am unable to see if the black sedan has the same.
There is a list of must haves for 48 and early 49's, depending where they were assembled?
still extremly interesting finds.
The Blue sedan has FJ's
But the Blue sedan has the night light switch on the underside of the right tail light fin, that makes it an early production model
Am unable to see if the black sedan has the same.
There is a list of must haves for 48 and early 49's, depending where they were assembled?
still extremly interesting finds.
SunnyTim wrote:The blue one is a 53 air-ride hence the FJ overriders.
The other FX like most has had a revamp at some stage, but engine 1036 would make it on of the first 30 48-215's made
I can't think what to write here so this will do.
no 1 Prototype plates reads
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
correspondence to the body must bear these numbers
STYLE NO 19525
BODY NO 1
TRIM NO 101
PAINT NO 1
TOP ACC
19525 was the number given to all the prototype cars.
I have a pic of the plate (but cant find it) of when the car was on public display here in canberra, and it is also pictured in Don Lofflers book.
The switch under the taillight was mandatory in some states right up until the end of production.
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
correspondence to the body must bear these numbers
STYLE NO 19525
BODY NO 1
TRIM NO 101
PAINT NO 1
TOP ACC
19525 was the number given to all the prototype cars.
I have a pic of the plate (but cant find it) of when the car was on public display here in canberra, and it is also pictured in Don Lofflers book.
The switch under the taillight was mandatory in some states right up until the end of production.
ejdave wrote:no 1 Prototype plates reads
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
correspondence to the body must bear these numbers
STYLE NO 19525
BODY NO 1
TRIM NO 101
PAINT NO 1
TOP ACC
19525 was the number given to all the prototype cars.
I have a pic of the plate (but cant find it) of when the car was on public display here in canberra, and it is also pictured in Don Lofflers book.
The switch under the taillight was mandatory in some states right up until the end of production.
Might explain the switch under the tailight.??
I can't think what to write here so this will do.
-
Smooth customs
- Posts: 771
- Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 3:51 pm
- State: NOT ENTERED