Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 1:43 am





FB-EK Holden Car Clubs of Australia
https://www.fbekholden.com/forum/
You and me both RB!!ratbox wrote:this made my head herti'de be putting the leaf springs back in OR refer back to
Panardrod sounds like a great idea, might stick with that.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
they work on many normal street cars and some that are quite quick around corners etc, my mates FC is a very simular rear end setup to yors with panard rod coil overs 4 link and we have been round turn 1 at eastern creek VERY fast and lived to tell the story, it is primarilly setup for straight line work (drag racing)
J, its a 4 link rear end setup and must have either a Panard Rod or Watts Link to stop the diff moving sideways (Commodores, Falcons etc all run Panards or Watts links (unless it's independent suspension), so it is not unusual, only for an EKJ wrote:I dont get it![]()
why do you need random thingamabobs coming off the diff?
V8EK4us wrote:You and me both RB!!ratbox wrote:this made my head herti'de be putting the leaf springs back in OR refer back to
Panardrod sounds like a great idea, might stick with that.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
they work on many normal street cars and some that are quite quick around corners etc, my mates FC is a very simular rear end setup to yors with panard rod coil overs 4 link and we have been round turn 1 at eastern creek VERY fast and lived to tell the story, it is primarilly setup for straight line work (drag racing)![]()
![]()
Now that there is no option but to run a watts link with bars parallel and horizontal I have returned to my original plan at the start of this build, the trusty Panard Rod. I have spent hours in the shed measuring and cutting templates but no matter what I do The Watts link causes too many other changes that I don't want changed as they were also in my original plans for good reason.
I have made a new Panard Rod and total diff movement to the left is now only 2.5mm on max travel (0.0 to 1mm on normal road use!), so all the mucking around has at least achieved that.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Gees.... I'm glad that's over, NEXT!!!!
Smooth customs wrote:You have been busy since last night.
But all aspects and options have to be looked at, you now will move on happier that there is no other way this area can be set up.