rat rod day...

Have you spotted any FB's or EK's we haven't seen before. Post your pics here.

Moderators: reidy, Blacky

mrs ratbox

Post by mrs ratbox »

you already know what i think luv it bar the bonnett :D hope yor not painting yor wheels gold :lol: :lol:
but it's not mine so do what you want with the bonnett :D
Malcolm
Posts: 709
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 8:20 am
State: NOT ENTERED
Location: Gympie

Rat rod day

Post by Malcolm »

Come on Ratbox,

You'll learn to love the bonnet too.
Malcolm W.
Mephious
Posts: 626
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 10:01 pm
State: NOT ENTERED
Location: Sydney

Re: Rat rod day

Post by Mephious »

Malcolm wrote:Nuh, don't like the colour of the wheels or the flutes in the guards.

Boy are you guys guna have a field day picking the shit out of my car when its finished

Mal
Was thinking the same thing bout mine Mal hahahahaha.

I have put late model gauges in mine, simply because I need them. No skulls thou. Im hoping the tan interior will work with the red paint , no high buckets .... campers seat.
smooth

Post by smooth »

You will have to have high back seats Scott to pass rego in NSW.

Regards, Smooth 8)
mrs ratbox

Post by mrs ratbox »

why does he need high back seats smooth :? ?
smooth

Post by smooth »

ratbox wrote:why does he need high back seats smooth :? ?
It's a standard safety requirement upgrade for the engineer's report (Whiplash). Just like heater demister, external mirrors etc.

But as we all know, some times you can get around these things. Commercial vehicles get more leeway (if on a full chassis).

Regards, Smooth 8)
mrs ratbox

Post by mrs ratbox »

i don't need 'em never have, the engineer i spoke to would actually prefer i have the standard bench seat :D
Malcolm
Posts: 709
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 8:20 am
State: NOT ENTERED
Location: Gympie

Rat rod day

Post by Malcolm »

Thats the first i've ever heard of having to have high back seats.
Well in QLD you don't need em anyway. But just the same i've got them in mine.
Malcolm W.
Trev
Posts: 7897
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 6:43 pm
State: NOT ENTERED
Location: Wonthaggi

Post by Trev »

Again it depends on the engineer, one bloke insisted I have them and another said don't be silly they would look out of place :roll: , Trev 8) .
[img]http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f177/trevwood/WOOFTOsmall.jpg[/img]
Woofto Car Club Member No3
FB MAD
Posts: 2725
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 7:59 pm
State: NOT ENTERED
Location: Upper Hunter N.S.W

Post by FB MAD »

HQ's didn't have highback seats and had all size motors from 173 to 350 (oh and New Zealand Highway Patrol 130 cube reds :shock: )

HJ was first with the highbacks and they had engines from 173 to 308.

I don't know why an engineer would ask for highbacks when HQ's didn't have them :? :? :?

Terry.
I can't think what to write here so this will do.
smooth

Post by smooth »

FB MAD wrote:
I don't know why an engineer would ask for highbacks when HQ's didn't have them :? :? :?

Terry.
Only the very first HQ's didn't have headrests in '71 all HQ's made in '72, '73 and '74 did!

I'm just telling you what the two usual engineers I have used ask for when adding big horse power increase.
My '71 LC XU-1 had to have high-back seats when I put the V8 in it in 1988. So too did all the other conversions we did during the '90. I remember the EH we put the 427 BB into had normal EH prem buckets and we had to borrow those poxy slip over head rests from a pommy Morris or Austin for the engineer's report (and they got stated on the report) Never seen them again after that day though! :shock:

Check with your engineers.

Regards, Smooth 8)
FB MAD
Posts: 2725
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 7:59 pm
State: NOT ENTERED
Location: Upper Hunter N.S.W

Post by FB MAD »

Hmmm.........

My '73 and '74 HQ's here at home ( I thought they were original ) must have been changed over then somewhere in their past as they both have buckets with the low headrests. :?
Another HQ here ( '72 ) has the High backs which I thought were from a HJ.
My other '71 HQ has bench seat.

Not doubting what you say smooth :wink:

I was thinking maybe very late HQ's ( late '74 ) may have had high backs as that's when the ADR's started that stipulated high back seats mandatory ( or around that time?? ).I know HJ,HX,HZ were definately all high backs.

Seems that engineers opinions can vary greatly as to what they require and their interpretation of the rules.

Terry.
I can't think what to write here so this will do.
oldnek
Posts: 1518
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 9:15 pm
State: NOT ENTERED
Location: Ulladulla NSW

Post by oldnek »

smooth wrote:
ratbox wrote:why does he need high back seats smooth :? ?
It's a standard safety requirement upgrade for the engineer's report (Whiplash). Just like heater demister, external mirrors etc.

Regards, Smooth 8)
I can tell you of a few people whom have all suffered whiplash in rear end impact, regardless of the high back seating or head restraints fitted.
So there theory dosn't suit me.
I rather the SHIT brace yourself, where about to prang method, only cause I like the lowback seats in all vehicles of that era.

Regards John :)
There's nothing as Sweet as a EK V8
mrs ratbox

Post by mrs ratbox »

it's nearly all crap 2 speed wipers pfft, window squirters pfft, demisters pfft :roll: :roll: :roll:
smooth

Post by smooth »

Terry,

Headrests or highback is what is required for rego. HQ's had headrests except for first release '71 HQ's which had no headrests just like a FB.

Tombstone highbacks started in HJ.

Regards, Smooth 8)
Post Reply