LX Torana front end

If it doesn't fit below then post here and see if another FB EK fanatic can help you out.

Moderators: reidy, Blacky

Post Reply
EK283
Posts: 2590
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 9:51 pm
State: NSW
Location: SYDNEY NSW

LX Torana front end

Post by EK283 »

Ok Guys,
What Torana front end is the go LX LH UC etc ???????
What can be intechanged from other models HQ HZ stubs and brakes etc etc ????????
I want to go this way but need some info


Regards Greg
So many cars so little time!
User avatar
V8EK4us
Posts: 1541
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 12:12 am
State: NOT ENTERED
Location: Mildura - Vic

Post by V8EK4us »

Hi Greg,
LH & LX are identical, UC varies slightly only because it has the "RTS" (Radial Tuned Suspension).
The HQ disc will fit the Torana stub and the HQ Caliper will bolt on to the Torana stub BUT .... to do this the HQ disc needs to be machined down (reduce diameter slightly), it does not reduce the track and will cause problems with the tyres rubbing because of this. The stub axles will "fit" and give you a 1" drop BUT ...... they change the steering geometry 1.5 degrees which causes "bump steer" and uneven tyre wear, so nothing can really be interchanged from HQ to benefit the graft into an FB/EK.
Best way is get some P76 disc and HQ calipers, Hopper Stoppers makes an adapter kit for this setup or you can purchase to complete bolt on setup for around $900 (new discs, spacers, recon' HQ calipers and Caliper mount included). This reduces the track in by 32mm.
Stubtech do a 2" drop spindle for the Torana for about $750/pair.

Advantages over HR frontend:
1/ Very strong wishbones and shock towers.
2/ Rear outriggers, this allows the Torana rack and pinion to fit in the original position with no mods required to the rack or frontend and doesn't look like an "after thought".
3/ Sump clearance is not an issue and also looks like a "factory" install.
4/ Better handling vehicle due to different geometry and design.

Disadvantages (additional work) over HR frontend:
1/ Not available as "changeover" from the likes of CRS, which means you have to do it with consultation with an Engineer or have it done by an Engineering firm (ouch!)
2/ A bit more expensive depending on what you do with the brakes and mount graft. If Torana brakes were used and wheels fitted with an offset to gain guard clearance then it would be a resonably cheap mod.
3/ Mounts need to be fabbed for the rear outrigger mounts.

In summary I believe it is a far better setup and looks like it should be there.

If you want, I can get all the measurements for the notching of the Torana crossmember and mount location to make sure the wheel base and location is right as my fronend will be coming back out shortly for painting :D :D :wink:

Hope this helps a bit.
:D :D :D :D
mrs ratbox

Post by mrs ratbox »

what he said
i look at it this way all yor steering geometry is factory designed (toranas steer lovely) and i've never heard somebody say a steering conversion (rack to HR front) being perfect there's always some issue wether big or small
EK283
Posts: 2590
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 9:51 pm
State: NSW
Location: SYDNEY NSW

Post by EK283 »

Thanks for the info Gary

Ratbox have heard the same as well. Ive got the HR set up and if I cant find a torana front end and cortina power rack I will give the HR front a go.

Regards Greg
So many cars so little time!
Post Reply